Sing, O Muse
by chuckofish
of the Rage of Achilles.
That’s Agamemnon looking worried on the left, while Athena (far right) tries to stop Achilles from chopping Agamemnon up into tiny pieces. I’m not sure the painting really captures the rage, but it is kind of pretty.
If your only acquaintance to The Iliad is through that ridiculous film, Troy, you can be forgiven for relegating the story to “the dustbin of history”. But I urge you to give the poem a chance. It, together with its twin, the Odyssey, ranks right up there with Shakespeare and the Bible — and it’s certainly the best war story ever.
What makes it great is its humanity. Sure, there’s plenty of testosterone-fuelled violence and, yes, the gods are interfering bastards, but there are real characters here, in real situations, to which the modern reader can still relate. I could go on and on, but today I’m going to concentrate on Achilles, who is, after all, central to the poem. The poet makes sure that Achilles is not just a dumb, sulky jerk. In fact, he gets some of the best lines, many of which point out the contradictions and difficulties inherent in war.
For example, during his argument with Agamemnon at the beginning of the poem, Achilles angrily declares that
I don’t have a quarrel with the Trojans
They didn’t do anything to me to make me
Come over here and fight, didn’t run off my cattle or horses
Or ruin my farmland back home in Pthia…
How often do soldiers find themselves wondering what their war really has to do with them? The Iliad is as conscious as we are that it’s the politicians (or in the poem’s case, kings) who start the wars and who send people to die in them, usually while they (the politicians) stand at the back. Achilles notably accuses Agamemnon of never having “buckled on armor in battle or come out with the best fighting Greeks” because it’s “more profitable to hang back in the army’s rear.” So true.
The poem also explores larger, more existential questions. In book 9, when people are trying to get Achilles to re-join the fight, he rants bitterly:
It doesn’t matter if you stay in camp or fight —
In the end, everyone comes out the same.
Coward and hero get the same reward:
You die whether you slack off or work.
In other words, life’s a bitch and then you die.
Even so, there’s a soft side to Achilles, who, in the same speech, reminds us that
Every decent, sane man
Loves his woman and cares for her, as I did,
Loved her from my heart. It doesn’t matter
That I won her with my spear.
Although it is common to assume that women in times past were horribly abused and oppressed, the poem is surprisingly appreciative of the plight of women, most of whom it is well aware will come to bad ends as a result of what men have done.
But the poem has a lighter side, too. Even the greatest of heroes were babies once. Phoenix, Achilles’ old nurse/mentor reminds the angry hero of their long-standing relationship:
You wouldn’t eat
Whether it was at a feast or a meal in the house
Unless I sat you on my lap and cut your food up
And fed it to you and held the wine to your lips.
Many a time you wet the tunic on my chest,
Burping up wine when you were colicky.
Okay, there’s also underage drinking here, but they didn’t have infant formula and wine was really the safest thing to drink…but anyway, you get the idea. Achilles was just as human as anyone else.
This poem has everything: action, adventure, plenty of conflict, lots of heart-rending emotional scenes, and a whole lot of wise things to say about human nature and war. Read it. Really. Stanley Lombardo’s translation, quoted here, is highly accessible, though it does take certain liberties. If you’re a purist, try Fagles’s or Latimore’s translations.


I think one of the main reasons I love “Matterhorn” so much is because Marlantes doesn’t dwell much on the “why are we hear?” question much. His response is that the men were in Vietnam and the only thing to worry about was the job they had to do. I think that’s why I hated “The Things They Carried” so much in High School. All O’Brien DOES is dwell on that question. And it comes off as whiny and annoying. It is a very valid question, of course, but I think soldiers do better not to worry much about the ‘why’ and focus on the ‘now.’ There’s the great line in “Zulu” when the soldier asks Colour Sgt. Bourne “why us?” His response “Because we’re here, lad” is perfect.
Or, for a more recent example, there’s Eric Bana’s character, Hoot, whose line at the end of “Black Hawk Down” is terribly apt: “When I go home people’ll ask me, “Hey Hoot, why do you do it man? What, you some kinda war junkie?” You know what I’ll say? I won’t say a goddamn word. Why? They won’t understand. They won’t understand why we do it. They won’t understand that it’s about the men next to you, and that’s it. That’s all it is.”
“Matterhorn” spends quite a bit of time on that question. It’s natural and, I think, inevitable that at some point a soldier is going to feel like it’s all crazy. What’s so great about both “Matterhorn” and “The Iliad” is that they understand that soldiers feel a host of different things at different times. Sometimes they want to kill the enemy; sometimes they want to kill their officers or each other; sometimes they are afraid; sometimes they enjoy the danger; sometimes they want to give up and sometimes they’ll do amazing, amazing feats of endurance because, as you say, they don’t want to let the other guys down.
I might add that The Iliad fully understands the contradictions of war: on one page the Greeks are honoring their enemies and on the next page they’re boasting of how they will take no prisoners, including women and children, when they sack Troy. The poet is as likely to talk of the “joy of war” as “the blood-filled horror of war” — it’s all of the above.
“Black Hawk Down” is a great movie! And while there are things about “The Things They Carried” that I appreciate, I agree with your point. And I think “Matterhorn” is the best war novel I’ve ever read and very much like “The Iliad” in some respects.
Haha you’re right, Aunt Sarah, Mellas spends the entire book struggling with ‘why’ he’s in Vietnam and I think what I was focussing on was his realization by the end of the book that he was there to do a job and he was going to stay on to do it, so that someone else needn’t have to go through what he did to “learn the ropes” so to speak. I think readers really love Mellas because while you feel bad for him, you are also really proud of him. He’s a great character.
Another thing I was reminded of reading your post is Josh Hartnett’s quote at the end of “Black Hawk Down” where he recalls a friend asking him “do you want to be some kind of hero?” and he responds (as he’s speaking to his dead friend) “No, nobody asks to be a hero.” Do you think Hector and Achilles would agree with that? Neither Hector or Achilles started the Trojan War but they both ultimately die (as heros) because they were doing what they thought they were honor-bound to do. I’ve opened up a huge new can of worms but I think modern wars can be comparable to ancient wars. In many ways, as you noted, Achilles is just as human as Mellas. I’m glad we have historians in our family who discuss these things.
Oh, you have opened a can of worms, but isn’t it interesting? I do not think that Achilles or Hector would agree with that sentiment. The idea is to be a hero. Everything — social standing, the future, power — depends on being a hero. But, yes, modern wars certainly do compare to ancient ones in many respect. Ah! I wish we could have a good sit down conversation about this. Thanks for your stimulating comments.
But both Hector and Achilles are already considered heroes in their respective societies by the time the war breaks out. The idea of being a hero is vital to each of them, but I don’t think that they fight the war for their own heroics, especially not Hector, who is fighting for the defense of his people. And while Achilles certainly couldn’t say no to Agamemnon (because that would have totally ruined his whole hero image) I still think he went for the same reason that Odysseus or Diomedes or Ajax or any of those guys went: for Menelaus’ honor. Neither Hector nor Achilles are in a position to back away from the fight, but that’s not why they fight, and I think they do fight less for their own personal reputations as heroes and more for the hero’s code of ethics, which is why we are able and happy to consider them heroes.
Yes, they are obligated to fight — and to live up to their reputations. It’s all very inter-twined. Such a great topic!